[PET] Open Access?
hugo.jonker at uni.lu
Thu Jun 14 14:28:44 BST 2012
I would prefer to keep the non-open access CFPs (irrespective of the
definition of "open access").
On 06/12/12 11:32, Ben Laurie wrote:
> I am contemplating not allowing CFPs etc for
> conferences/books/whatever that are not open access.
> Do people have opinions?
> PET mailing list
> PET at lists.links.org
More information about the PET