[PET] Negative Results in Security and Privacy

Günter Müller mueller at iig.uni-freiburg.de
Tue May 31 09:30:44 BST 2011

Privacy Research needs experiments like this. I congratulate. But I need 
to add some concerns. First, Aquisti, Spiekermann und Guenther have done 
experiments like this about 5 years ago. We have done this even longer 
ago. Kaiser J, Reichenbach M. "Evaluating security tools towards usable 
security". Hammond, J., Gross, T., Wesson, J.: Usability Gaining a 
Competitive Edge, IFIP 17th World Computer Congress, Montreal, Canada, 
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 25.-30. August; 2002.

  The approach approach as fas as the concentration on monetoary factors 
for was identical to yours. But: The concentration on monetary factors 
is just one aspect, which is well understood if one is not concerned 
with the specificity of goods. A commodity has less privacy concern that 
a person related product. For the latter case also Aquisti has shown 
that privacy really matters.

Best regards

G. Mueller

On 30.05.2011 19:44, Sören Preibusch wrote:
> When looking for negative results, inter alia, our recent field experiment
> did reveal: consumers do not prefer privacy-friendly retailers even if
> everything else is the same
> <http://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp5017.html>, "Unwillingness to Pay for
> Privacy: A Field Experiment".
> So, yes, such findings are relevant.
> Sören
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pet-bounces at lists.links.org [mailto:pet-bounces at lists.links.org] On
> Behalf Of Matthijs R. Koot
> Sent: 15 May 2011 17:16
> To: Discussion of privacy enhancing technologies
> Subject: [PET] Negative Results in Security and Privacy
> Hi pet at lists.links.org,
> Biomedicine has a Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine:
> http://www.jnrbm.com/
> Could a "Journal of Negative Results in Security and Privacy" (and/or
> Surveillance) be viable? Topic for a panel discussion at PETS 2011?
> Best regards,
> Matthijs R. Koot
> University of Amsterdam, NL
> _______________________________________________
> PET mailing list
> PET at lists.links.org
> http://lists.links.org/mailman/listinfo/pet
> _______________________________________________
> PET mailing list
> PET at lists.links.org
> http://lists.links.org/mailman/listinfo/pet
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mueller.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 419 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.links.org/pipermail/pet/attachments/20110531/5c6e4ef3/attachment.vcf>

More information about the PET mailing list