[PET] PETS 2010
schnur at gmail.com
Fri Jul 30 22:20:36 BST 2010
I think many people had lots of fun. I personally very much enjoyed meeting
many new people; of course seeing new directions in anonymity in the work by
Prateek and George, throwing questions on regulations at Dr Alexander Dix --
privacy comissioner for Berlin -- (Hannes, did he ever send us slides for
his talk?), having a philosophical discussion or two with Chris, and perhaps
most of all catching up with old friends :)
Thanks to everyone, especially Hannes, Mikhail and Nick -- I had a great
time!!! Looking forward to Waterloo next year already...
Emiliano, I would be quite up for contributing to the PETS summary!
On 30 July 2010 20:41, Aleecia M. McDonald <aleecia at aleecia.com> wrote:
> Cool idea, but please do not make those of us who could not attend wait on
> IEEE publication. :-)
> I would very much appreciate an early look at a summary. How did it go this
> On Jul 30, 2010, at 5:47 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>> On Jul 26, 2010, at 3:24 17PM, Emiliano De Cristofaro wrote:
>> Dear PETers,
>>> This year's PETS has once again produced many interesting results and
>>> Also, I think that our time in Berlin was quite pleasant, wasn't it? :)
>>> So, why should we stop here?
>>> I was thinking of putting together a small document summarizing the
>>> trends that have emerged from the symposium: hot topics and open problems
>>> related to privacy, as well as the most controversial discussions that came
>>> out of the sessions and breaks.
>> Sounds like a great paper for IEEE S&P magazine.
>> --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb<http://www.cs.columbia.edu/%7Esmb>
>> PET mailing list
>> PET at lists.links.org
> PET mailing list
> PET at lists.links.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the PET