[PET] Moderating the PETS list?

Stefan Sackmann stefan.sackmann at wiwi.uni-halle.de
Thu Jul 15 10:39:45 BST 2010

Von: Emiliano De Cristofaro <edecrist at uci.edu>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Juli 2010 11:30
An: pet at lists.links.org <pet at lists.links.org>
Betreff: Re: [PET] Moderating the PETS list?

Dear All,

I agree with Roger and I think that PETS mailing list should be more specific to privacy-related topics.
CPF-s are in fact useful, but as long as they are for (non-embarrassing) security and privacy-related conferences.

Therefore my opinion is to moderate the list.

Cheers and see you in Berlin!

On 7/15/10 10:51 AM, Marco A. Calamari wrote:

On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 13:34 -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:

This list has turned into a train wreck of CFPs that aren't affiliated
with PETS. Next week I'm going to raise the question of whether we should
moderate it, or what else we can do to get it back to the "low volume
PETS-specific mailing list" that it used to be.

Now you have a week to ponder your opinion. :)

11 messages in 15 day is less than 1 msg/day,
 and I normally can afford a list with such volume
In addition CFP for me are interesting.

But I understand the problem of OT.

In summary, my vote: neutral

.. so this is a very useful message anyway... ;)

PET mailing list
PET at lists.links.org<mailto:PET at lists.links.org>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.links.org/pipermail/pet/attachments/20100715/ad8ef4c5/attachment.html>

More information about the PET mailing list