[PET] Moderating the PETS list?
claudia.diaz at esat.kuleuven.be
Mon Jul 19 09:45:04 BST 2010
On 16 Jul 2010, at 23:03:23, Matthijs R. Koot wrote:
> Emiliano De Cristofaro wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> I agree with Roger and I think that PETS mailing list should be more
>> specific to privacy-related topics.
>> CPF-s are in fact useful, but as long as they are for (non-embarrassing)
>> security and privacy-related conferences.
> +1. In addition I'd love to see (topical) discussions on either *this*
> list or, if communis opinio prefers, a separate high(er)-volume
> "pet-discussion" list. Ideally it would be place that invites
> high-quality discussion and welcomes everybody to express new ideas,
> 'crazy' thoughts, and criticism.
+1. I also think moderation would be needed to filter out the embarrassing CFPs and the non-relevant emails.
More information about the PET