[PET] Moderating the PETS list?

Emiliano De Cristofaro edecrist at uci.edu
Thu Jul 15 10:24:05 BST 2010

Dear All,

I agree with Roger and I think that PETS mailing list should be more 
specific to privacy-related topics.
CPF-s are in fact useful, but as long as they are for (non-embarrassing) 
security and privacy-related conferences.

Therefore my opinion is to moderate the list.

Cheers and see you in Berlin!

On 7/15/10 10:51 AM, Marco A. Calamari wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 13:34 -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> This list has turned into a train wreck of CFPs that aren't affiliated
>> with PETS. Next week I'm going to raise the question of whether we should
>> moderate it, or what else we can do to get it back to the "low volume
>> PETS-specific mailing list" that it used to be.
>> Now you have a week to ponder your opinion. :)
> 11 messages in 15 day is less than 1 msg/day,
>   and I normally can afford a list with such volume
> In addition CFP for me are interesting.
> But I understand the problem of OT.
> In summary, my vote: neutral
> .. so this is a very useful message anyway... ;)
> _______________________________________________
> PET mailing list
> PET at lists.links.org
> http://lists.links.org/mailman/listinfo/pet

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.links.org/pipermail/pet/attachments/20100715/3079d930/attachment.html>

More information about the PET mailing list