[PET] Moderating the PETS list?

Ben Laurie ben at links.org
Tue Aug 17 05:28:40 BST 2010


On 31/07/2010 01:59, Nikita Borisov wrote:
> Another option would be to make a clearer policy about off-topic posts
> & CFPs and moderate those users who violate it.  Less work for the
> moderator that way.

I'm going to switch on moderation for everyone. Those who behave get it
switched off :-)

> 
> - Nikita
> 
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Ben Laurie <ben at links.org> wrote:
>> On 14/07/2010 18:34, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>>> This list has turned into a train wreck of CFPs that aren't affiliated
>>> with PETS. Next week I'm going to raise the question of whether we should
>>> moderate it, or what else we can do to get it back to the "low volume
>>> PETS-specific mailing list" that it used to be.
>>
>> It actually is moderated for non-subscribers, btw, but subscribers can
>> post without moderation.
>>
>> I am open to the idea of moderating all posts.
>>
>> --
>> http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html           http://www.links.org/
>>
>> "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
>> doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
>> _______________________________________________
>> PET mailing list
>> PET at lists.links.org
>> http://lists.links.org/mailman/listinfo/pet
>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html           http://www.links.org/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff


More information about the PET mailing list